Important words and concepts from Chapter 23, Campbell & Reece, 2002 (3/25/2005):

by Stephen T. Abedon (abedon.1@osu.edu) for Biology 113 at the Ohio State University

 

 

Course-external links are in brackets

Click [index] to access site index

Click here to access text’s website

Vocabulary words are found below

 

 

(1) Chapter title: The Evolution of Populations

(a)                    "An organism exposes its phenotype—its physical traits, metabolism, physiology, and behavior—not its genotype, to the environment. Acting on phenotypes, selection indirectly adapts a population to its environment by increasing or maintaining favorable genotypes in the gene pool." (p. 430)

(b)                    "One obstacle to understanding evolution is the common misconception that individual organisms evolve, in the Darwinian sense, during their lifetimes. In fact, natural selection does act on individuals; their characteristics affect their chances of survival and reproductive success. But the evolutionary impact of this natural selection is only apparent in tracking how a population of organisms changes over time… Thus, it is the population, not its individuals, that evolves, as some heritable variation becomes more common at the expense of others." (p. 416)

(c)                    ["To the people gathered there, most of whom had no more than a first- or second-grade education, some genetic principles seemed to make intuitive sense, whereas others did not. No one had trouble, for instance, understanding that traits can be inherited. But the fact that the probability of inheriting a trait is unrelated to the previous births was more difficult to grasp. If one parent has the Alzheimer's mutation, there is a 50 percent risk that each child will have it too. But, just as parents who have had three girls in a row may expect their chance of having a boy to increase, the villagers endorsed a logical fallacy. One man announced to the assembled group: ‘We the families in which there are only a few affecteds must be grateful to those families with many affecteds.’ Local ideas of guilt and collective burden were deeply ingrained, and clashed with the principles of population genetics." p. 15 of Kenneth S. Kosik, 1999, The fortune teller, The Sciences 39:13-17]

(d)                    [the evolution of populations (Google Search)] [population evolution and speciation (BSC Courseware)] [index]

 

MICROEVOLUTION TOOLS AND OVERVIEW

 

(2) Population genetics

(a)                    Population genetics is essentially the study of allele and genotype frequencies within populations of organisms

(b)                    [population genetics (Google Search)] [DNA technology in forensic science (welcome to applied population genetics) (Committee on DNA Technology in Forensic Science)] [index]

(3) Modern synthesis

(a)                    The ultimate triumph of Darwinism required its integration with Mendelian genetics

(b)                    That is, evolution is a genetic phenomenon so cannot be fully (or even well) understood without an understanding of Mendelian genetics

(c)                    This synthesis between Darwinism and Mendelian genetics did not occur until the 1930s (recall that Darwinism and Mendelian genetics both came into being during the mid to late 1800s)

(d)                    The combination of Darwinism and Mendelian genetics is called the modern synthesis (of Darwinism and Mendelian genetics as well as paleontology, taxonomy, biogeography, and population genetics)

(e)                    "The modern synthesis emphasizes the importance of populations as the units of evolution, the central role of natural selection as the most important mechanism of evolution, and the idea of gradualism to explain how large changes can evolve as an accumulation of small changes occurring over long periods of time."

(f)                      ["…the Modern Synthesis is a theory about how evolution works at the level of genes, phenotypes, and populations whereas Darwinism was concerned mainly with organisms, speciation and individuals. This is a major paradigm shift and those who fail to appreciate it find themselves out of step with the thinking of evolutionary biologists. Many instances of such confusion can be seen here in the newsgroups, in the popular press, and in the writings of anti-evolutionists." (Talk.Origins)]

(g)                    [modern synthesis, the modern synthesis of genetics and evolution  (Google Search)] [index]

(4) Population

(a)                    The term population is more complex than you may realize

(b)                    However we will delay our discussion of the complexity inherent in the term population until our considerations of speciation

(c)                    For now, consider a population to be a localized group of interbreeding individuals (with lots of emphasis on interbreeding)

(d)                    [interbreeding population (Google Search)] [index]

(5) Species

(a)                    The term species is also fraught with complexity which will be considered more fully when we discuss speciation

(b)                    For now, consider a species to be a group of populations whose members are capable of interbreeding

(c)                    Species and populations possess certain properties (or characteristics) such as their location that we will discuss in more detail when considering population ecology

(d)                    One property is that the population's underlying a species may undergo different degrees of gene exchange ranging from very little (an isolated population) to quite a bit

(e)                    [species (Google Search)] [index]

(6) Gene pool

(a)                    In a population genetics sense, a population or species consists of a gene pool

(b)                    A gene pool "consists of all alleles at all gene loci in all individuals in a population."

(c)                    Recall that diploid individuals possess two alleles at each locus

(d)                    [gene pool (Google Search)] [index]

(7) Fixed locus (fixed allele)

(a)                    A locus for which only a single allele exists for an entire gene pool is considered to be fixed, i.e., a fixed locus

(b)                    We would describe the frequency of a fixed allele within a gene pool as 1.0

(c)                    We would describe the frequency of all other alleles as 0.0 (i.e., they are not present)

(d)                    An allele with a frequency of 0.0 is said to be extinct

(e)                    ["fixed locus" and genetics, "fixed locus" and evolution, fixed allele, fixed alleles (Google Search)] [index]

(8) Gene frequency (allele frequency)

(a)                    All alleles at not-fixed loci possess a frequency that is somewhere between 0.0 and 1.0

(b)                    We describe this frequency as allele frequency or, less correctly but more commonly, as gene frequency

(c)                    Remember that gene (or allele) frequency refers to the frequency of alleles in an entire gene pool, not in single individuals

(d)                    Remember that each diploid individual has two alleles at each locus

(e)                    [gene frequency, gene frequencies, allele frequency, allele frequencies (Google Search)] [index]

(9) Genotype frequency

(a)                    Remember that any one individual may be homozygous for only one allele of the one or more present in the population (at a given locus) or a given individual may be heterozygous at that locus

(b)                    Thus, three alleles (or many more) can exist in a population (with associated allele frequencies) but only up to two alleles at a time can exist within a given individual

(c)                    The frequency of genotypes within a population is dependent on the frequency of alleles (and visa versa, actually)

(d)                    It is only within genotypes that evolution acts on alleles

(e)                    Consequently, to understand evolution and evolutionary change, it is usually important to keep track of allele frequencies and to keep track of genotype frequencies

(f)                      That is, make sure the following makes sense to you:

(i)                      natural selection acts on phenotypes

(ii)                    genotypes underlie phenotypes

(iii)                   alleles underlie genotypes

(g)                    [genotype frequency (Google Search)] [index]

(10) Genetic structure (supplemental concept)

(a)                    Genetic structure is a population genetics term used to refer to a population’s allele and genotype frequencies

(b)                    Evolution may be defined as change over time of a population's genetic structure

(c)                    "Evolution is a generation-to-generation change in a population's frequencies of alleles and genotypes—a change in a population's genetic structure."

(d)                    [genetic structure (Google Search)] [index]

(11) Calculating allele frequencies

(a)                    Remember that a diploid organism has two (not necessarily different) alleles at each locus

(b)                    The frequency of an allele within a population is equal to the number of alleles of a given type within the population divided by the total number of alleles found at a given locus

(c)                    Thus, if 200 A alleles and 400 a alleles are found within a given population, then the frequency of A alleles is 200 / (200 + 400) = 1/3 = 0.33.

(d)                    If this is a diploid population, how many individuals are in this population? (answer: 300… make sure that these ideas and calculations make sense to you)

(e)                    [calculating allele frequencies, determining allele frequencies (Google Search)] [index]

(12) Calculating allele frequencies from genotype frequencies

(a)                    Note that very often one knows (or can infer) genotype frequency

(b)                    If so, then genotype frequency information can be used to calculate allele frequency. How?

(c)                    If a population has 100 Aa individuals, 200 aa individuals, and 300 AA individuals then the number of A alleles is 100*1 + 300*2 = 700; the number of a alleles is 100*1 + 200*2 = 500; the frequency of A therefore is 700 / (500 + 700) = 7/12 = 0.58

(d)                    Remember, diploid individuals contribute two alleles from each locus to the gene pool (hence the *2 in the above calculations); How many diploid individuals are present in the above example?

(e)                    [Calculating allele frequencies from genotype frequencies (Google Search)] [index]

 

CALCULATING GENOTYPE FREQUENCIES FROM ALLELE FREQUENCIES

 

(13) Calculating genotype frequencies from allele frequencies

(a)                    Calculating genotype frequencies from allele frequencies is also possible, but requires quite a bit of fudging

(b)                    In fact, much of this chapter deals with this fudging

(c)                    However, the calculations are simple: One assumes simply that alleles are picked at random from the gene pool to assemble genotypes

(d)                    Assume that the frequency of allele A is 0.4 and that the frequency of allele a is 0.6; What is the frequency of genotypes AA, Aa, and aa?

(i)                      Frequency AA = 0.4 * 0.4 = 0.16

(ii)                    Frequency aa = 0.6 * 0.6 = 0.36

(iii)                   Frequency Aa = 0.4 * 0.6 + 0.6 * 0.4 = 0.48

(e)                    Remember that there are two paths by which the heterozygote may be constructed, A from mom and a from dad, or a from mom and A from dad (make sure that this idea makes sense to you)

(f)                      Now, substitute the letter p for the frequency of A (i.e., in this example p = 0.4) and the letter q for the frequency of a (i.e., in this example q = 0.6); what is the frequency of the genotypes AA, Aa, and aa?

(i)                      Frequency AA = p * p = p2

(ii)                    Frequency aa = q * q = q2

(iii)                   Frequency Aa = p * q + q * p = 2pq

(g)                    Note that for a locus for which only two alleles are present in a population:

(i)                      p2 + 2pq + q2  = 1 = (p + q)2

(h)                    In addition, of course, keep in mind that

(i)                      p = 1 – q

(ii)                    q = 1 – p

(iii)                   1 = p + q

(i)                      Again, make sure that these ideas and generalizations make sense to you, particularly to the point where you are able to apply these ideas

(j)                      [(Google Search)] [index]

(14) Hidden recessives

(a)                    Genotype frequencies do not necessarily coincide with phenotype frequencies (e.g., as a consequence of complete dominance) so calculating genotype frequencies from phenotype frequencies is not necessarily straightforward

(b)                    However, if the frequency of the recessive allele is q then

(i)                      the frequency of the recessive homozygote is q2

(ii)                    the frequency of the dominant homozygote is (1 - q)2

(iii)                   the frequency of the heterozygote is 2 * q * (1 - q)

(iv)                  (these ideas and concepts should eventually make intuitive sense to you and you should be working towards that point, so make sure that these ideas makes sense to you to this point, before you move on, such that you are at least able to recapitulate and then utilize the underlying logic, e.g., why is the frequency of the dominant homozygote equal to (1 - q)2?)

(c)                    Thus, if the recessive allele, a, has a frequency of 0.01, then

(i)                      Frequency AA = 0.99 * 0.99 = 0.98

(ii)                    Frequency Aa = 2 * 0.99 * 0.01 = 0.02

(iii)                   Frequency aa = 0.01 * 0.01 = 0.0001

(d)                    (do you know where the above numbers come from? if you don’t, then you don’t understand the concept so go back and try again)

(e)                    In other words, in this example there are 200 times more heterozygotes carrying the recessive allele than there are recessive homozygotes carrying the recessive allele—rare recessive alleles are hidden in populations within heterozygotes (where does “200 times” come from? you should be able to understand this… if you don’t then go back and try again)

(f)                      "The rarer the recessive allele, the greater the degree of protection afforded by heterozygosity."

(g)                    That is, as recessive alleles become more and more rare, many, many more carriers of this allele will be heterozygotes (who are assymptomatic in the case of complete dominance, i.e., are hidden recessives) rather than homozygotes

(h)                    [hidden recessives, hidden recessive (Google Search)] [index]

(15) The Hardy-Weinberg theorem

(a)                    The above calculations are stated more formally as the Hardy-Weinberg theorem

(b)                    “The theorem states that the frequencies of alleles and genotypes in a population’s gene pool remain constant over the generations unless acted upon by agents other than Mendelian segregation and recombination of alleles.” (p. 447, Campbell & Reece, 2002)

(c)                    “The system operates somewhat like shuffling a deck of cards: No matter how many times the deck is reshuffled to deal out new hands, the deck itself remains the same. Aces do not grow more numerous than jacks. And the repeated shuffling of a population’s gene pool over the generations cannot, in itself, increase the frequency of one allele relative to another.” (p. 448, Campbell & Reece, 2002)

(d)                    In the Hardy-Weinberg theorem it is assumed that matings between individuals within a population occur randomly and that no evolution is occurring within the population

(e)                    Under such conditions genotype frequency may be calculated from allele frequency information as described above (i.e., p2 + 2pq + q2)

(f)                      The existence of this calculation given these assumptions is termed the Hardy-Weinberg theorem

(g)                    See Figure 23.3, The Hardy-Weinberg theorem

(h)                   

(i)                      “The Hardy-Weinberg theorem is important conceptually and historically because it shows how Mendel’s theory of inheritance plugs a hole in Darwin’s theory of natural selection… The Hardy-Weinberg theorem explains how Mendelian inheritance preserves genetic variation from one generation to the next.” (p. 449, Campbell & Reece, 2002)

(j)                      [Hardy-Weinberg theorem (Google Search)] [Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (a guide to teaching H-W at the pre-college level) (see also…) (Judith Stanhope)] [population genetics, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and the modes of evolution (a lecture) (Rebecca Irwin)] [model construction and the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (model construction and hypothesis testing using Hardy-Weinberg as example) (Biomathematics -- Sally Otto)] [index]

(16) Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

(a)                    Note that so long as no evolution is occurring within a population then allele frequencies are not changing within that population

(b)                    So long as allele frequencies are not changing, then genotype frequencies may be calculated using the Hardy-Weinberg theorem

(c)                    Furthermore, so long as these conditions stay the same, then genotype frequency will remain the same, as calculated above (this is true because genotype frequencies under these conditions are not a function of genotype frequencies so much as allele frequencies, and allele frequencies we are assuming are not changing)

(d)                    The constant genotype frequencies in the absence of evolution and given Hardy-Weinberg conditions is called Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

(e)                    That this is an equilibrium is implied by the absence of change over time (particularly change in genotype frequency since a lack of change in allele frequencies is, in fact, one of our assumptions)

(f)                      Remember that, given the appropriate conditions (above), it takes only a single generation to generate a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

(g)                    ["The discrete genes Mendel discovered would exist at some frequency in natural populations. Biologists wondered how and if these frequencies would change. Many thought that the more common versions of genes would increase in frequency simply because they were already at high frequency. Hardy and Weinberg independently showed that the frequency of an allele would not change over time simply due to its being rare or common." (Talk.Origins)]

(h)                    [Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium simulator, Hardy-Weinberg problems (Google Search)] [population genetics, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and the modes of evolution (Biology 391: Organic Evolution)] [index]

(17) No evolution” (= a